‹ All models
Qwen

Training Qwen3.8-27B on H100

Ranked by tokens/s per GPU · 8,192-token SFT rows · global batch 128 · BF16
#Tokens/s per GPU$ / 1M tokensGPUsLayoutMeasuredAuthor
#11,480.4$1.298TP1 PP4 DP2
16/17/17/14 layer split, CPU optimizer offload
2026-10-18ATTUNERecipe ›

Notes for Qwen3.8-27B

MODEL_ARGS are slime's scripts/models/qwen3.5-27B.sh: Qwen3.8-27B has the Qwen3.5-27B architecture. Its tokenizer adds 7 special tokens and a default system prompt, so it trains on its own rows (data/README.md).

The steps every recipe shares: Running a recipe.

Recipes

#1attune-tp1-pp4-split161,480.4 tokens/s/GPUTP1 PP4 DP216/17/17/14 layer split, CPU optimizer offload
  • Starting point: slime's Qwen3.5-27B script, scripts/run-qwen3.5-27B.sh with scripts/models/qwen3.5-27B.sh at slime 0.3.0. slime ships it as a 4-node GRPO script and publishes no tokens/s figure for it. Ported to this workload on one 8-GPU node with its layout (TP 4 with sequence parallel, PP 2 with 34/30 layers, CP 1 in place of its CP 4, full recompute, Adam on the CPU), it measured 861.5 tokens/s/GPU on 8 H100; ATTUNE tuned it to 1,480.4 (+72%).
  • Step times of the measured run range from 78.7 s to 105.6 s (median 87.0 s), which sets the 8.9% step-time CV.
  • The optimizer stays on the CPU: the tuning run that kept 30% of it on the GPU (--optimizer-offload-fraction 0.7) ran out of memory on the last stage, which holds the FP32 logits of the 248,320-token vocabulary.
Author
ATTUNE (cite)
GPUs
8 x H100 80 GB (AWS p5.48xlarge, 8 per node)
Layout
TP 1, PP 4 (16/17/17/14 layers), CP 1, DP 2; one 8,192-token row per microbatch; full recompute (uniform, 1 layer); CPU optimizer offload with overlapped copies and the precision-aware optimizer; dense model, no experts
Tokens/s per GPU
1,480.40
$ / 1M tokens
$1.29
MFU
23.0% (N = 25,623,920,640 active parameters per token)
Step-time CV
8.93%
Convergence check
correlation 0.9999966, final loss difference 8.3e-05, 0 pointwise failures over 20 steps
Measured
2026-10-18
GPU-hours
5.23
Rows
qwen38-tulu3-fixed8192-v1 (rows_sha256 ee1486b28ce21df721ad61c2d3765c64a29eed0eb5680ede005bd6a321dc1a1e)

Stack

framework
slime 0.3.0: THUDM/slime a897e1f plus 8 commits that do not change the training step
megatron lm
commit 1dcf0daf (megatron-core 0.16.0rc0), with a backported upstream fix for the Qwen3.5 attention output gate at TP above the query-group count
transformer engine
2.10.0
pytorch
2.11.0 (CUDA 12.9 build)
cuda
12.9
nccl
2.28.9 (CUDA 12.9 build; printed by the measured run)
deepep
1.2.1
python
3.12.3
network
8 GPUs per node, EFA, 3.2 Tb/s RDMA per node

Environment

  • CUDA_DEVICE_MAX_CONNECTIONS=1
  • PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True
  • TORCHINDUCTOR_COMPILE_THREADS=1
  • NCCL_NVLS_ENABLE=$([ "$NVLINK_COUNT" -gt 0 ] && echo 1 || echo 0)
CommandHow to run
export CUDA_DEVICE_MAX_CONNECTIONS=1
export PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True
export TORCHINDUCTOR_COMPILE_THREADS=1
export NCCL_NVLS_ENABLE=$([ "$NVLINK_COUNT" -gt 0 ] && echo 1 || echo 0)

python3 -m <slime entry module> --async \
  --actor-num-nodes 1 \
  --actor-num-gpus-per-node 8 \
  ${MODEL_ARGS[@]} \
  --hf-checkpoint "$HF_CKPT" \
  --ref-load "$TORCH_DIST" \
  --rollout-function-path pretokenized_sft_rollout.generate_rollout \
  --prompt-data "$SFT_DATA" \
  --input-key messages \
  --metadata-key metadata \
  --num-rollout 20 \
  --rollout-batch-size 128 \
  --global-batch-size 128 \
  --loss-type sft_loss \
  --loss-mask-type qwen3_5 \
  --calculate-per-token-loss \
  --disable-compute-advantages-and-returns \
  --debug-train-only \
  --tensor-model-parallel-size 1 \
  --pipeline-model-parallel-size 4 \
  --decoder-first-pipeline-num-layers 16 \
  --decoder-last-pipeline-num-layers 14 \
  --context-parallel-size 1 \
  --expert-model-parallel-size 1 \
  --expert-tensor-parallel-size 1 \
  --recompute-granularity full \
  --recompute-method uniform \
  --recompute-num-layers 1 \
  --use-dynamic-batch-size \
  --max-tokens-per-gpu 8192 \
  --optimizer adam --lr 1e-5 --lr-decay-style cosine --min-lr 1e-6 \
  --lr-warmup-fraction 0.1 --weight-decay 0.1 --adam-beta1 0.9 --adam-beta2 0.98 \
  --use-distributed-optimizer \
  --optimizer-cpu-offload \
  --overlap-cpu-optimizer-d2h-h2d \
  --use-precision-aware-optimizer \
  --attention-dropout 0.0 --hidden-dropout 0.0 \
  --accumulate-allreduce-grads-in-fp32 --attention-softmax-in-fp32 \
  --attention-backend flash \
  --distributed-timeout-minutes 30 \
  --tensorboard-dir "$PROFILE_DIR"
recipes/qwen3.8-27b/h100/attune-tp1-pp4-split16.yamlDownloadGitHub
# recipes/qwen3.8-27b/h100/attune-tp1-pp4-split16.yaml
# An OpenRecipes recipe; the fields are documented in schema/recipe.schema.yaml.
schema_version: 1
model: Qwen3.8-27B
gpu:
  type: H100
  memory_gb: 80
  count: 8
  per_node: 8
  instance: AWS p5.48xlarge
author:
  name: ATTUNE
  url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17528
status: verified
stack:
  framework: 'slime 0.3.0: THUDM/slime a897e1f plus 8 commits that do not change the training step'
  megatron_lm: commit 1dcf0daf (megatron-core 0.16.0rc0), with a backported upstream fix for the Qwen3.5 attention output
    gate at TP above the query-group count
  transformer_engine: 2.10.0
  pytorch: 2.11.0 (CUDA 12.9 build)
  cuda: '12.9'
  nccl: 2.28.9 (CUDA 12.9 build; printed by the measured run)
  deepep: 1.2.1
  python: 3.12.3
  network: 8 GPUs per node, EFA, 3.2 Tb/s RDMA per node
  source: 'in-pod version checks of the measured run''s training image, 2026-10-13 and 2026-10-18: installed TE, PyTorch,
    DeepEP and megatron-core, Megatron-LM git commit, Python; NCCL from the measured run''s log'
workload:
  row_tokens: 8192
  rows: SFT conversations
  global_batch: 128
  precision: bf16
  dataset:
    name: Tulu 3 SFT mixture
    source: allenai/tulu-3-sft-mixture
    revision: b14afda60f1bbebe55d5d2fa1e4df5042f97f8be
    license: ODC-By 1.0
    rows_sha256: ee1486b28ce21df721ad61c2d3765c64a29eed0eb5680ede005bd6a321dc1a1e
    build:
      name: qwen38-tulu3-fixed8192-v1
      tokenizer: Qwen3.8 (the Qwen3.8-27B tokenizer; tokenizer.json sha256 0997f410c57a1f4e53b09e4be8f4a172d90edd9564368fb0847030937229b9f3)
      loss_mask: qwen3_5
      rows: 6400
      row_tokens: 8192
      padding_tokens: 0
      seed: 42
      packing: source conversations in a seeded global permutation, concatenated with an EOS token between them and cut
        into consecutive 8,192-token rows; rows without supervised targets are skipped
      supervised_token_ratio: 0.642
      parquet_sha256: a7b7b4db98e95152604a77bcf09b51502d2266ba04de98409cef6b97afd039c8
      parquet_bytes: 76722714
      builder: data/generate_fixed_sft.py (data/README.md)
layout:
  label: TP1 PP4 DP2
  summary: TP 1, PP 4 (16/17/17/14 layers), CP 1, DP 2; one 8,192-token row per microbatch; full recompute (uniform, 1
    layer); CPU optimizer offload with overlapped copies and the precision-aware optimizer; dense model, no experts
  highlights: 16/17/17/14 layer split, CPU optimizer offload
  tp: 1
  pp: 4
  vpp: 1
  cp: 1
  ep: 1
  etp: 1
  dp: 2
  sequence_parallel: false
  layer_split:
    first: 16
    last: 14
  max_tokens_per_gpu: 8192
  rows_per_microbatch: 1
  recompute:
    granularity: full
    method: uniform
    num_layers: 1
  offload:
    optimizer_fraction: 1.0
    overlap_d2h_h2d: true
  dispatcher: null
result:
  tokens_per_s_per_gpu: 1480.4
  usd_per_million_tokens: 1.29
  step_time_cv_percent: 8.93
  mfu: 0.2301
  mfu_note: null
  active_params:
    count: 25623920640
    source: https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B
    revision: 1d4bf0f2ff6012fd82039f2fa52739d0dd7c60c0
  measured: 2026-10-18
  steps_per_run: 20
  window:
  - 5
  - 19
  window_tokens: 15728640
  runs: 1
  profiler: false
  gpu_hours: 5.23
  gpu_hours_note: GPUs x (scheduler admission to finish), including startup; the same run is the candidate arm of the
    convergence check
correctness:
  result: pass
  summary: passed
  reference: 'The layout of slime''s `scripts/run-qwen3.5-27B.sh` on one 8-GPU node: TP 4 with sequence parallelism, PP
    2 (first stage 34 layers, last 30), CP 1 in place of its CP 4, full recompute and CPU optimizer offload, with this
    recipe''s optimizer settings.'
  configuration: pass
  component_tests: []
  convergence:
    steps: 20
    result: pass
    correlation: 0.9999966
    final_loss_difference: 8.3e-05
    pointwise_failures: 0
    note: 'candidate arm: the measured run; reference arm: a 20-step run of the reference recipe on the same image and
      rows; the parity probe off in both'
  rules: argument classes of ATTUNE's skill/scripts/correctness/rules/numerics_list.yaml (amazon-science/attune f2cb450);
    20-step check by Megatron-Bridge validate_convergence with its pipeline thresholds
env:
  CUDA_DEVICE_MAX_CONNECTIONS: '1'
  PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF: expandable_segments:True
  TORCHINDUCTOR_COMPILE_THREADS: '1'
  NCCL_NVLS_ENABLE: $([ "$NVLINK_COUNT" -gt 0 ] && echo 1 || echo 0)
patches: []
run: |
  export CUDA_DEVICE_MAX_CONNECTIONS=1
  export PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True
  export TORCHINDUCTOR_COMPILE_THREADS=1
  export NCCL_NVLS_ENABLE=$([ "$NVLINK_COUNT" -gt 0 ] && echo 1 || echo 0)

  python3 -m <slime entry module> --async \
    --actor-num-nodes 1 \
    --actor-num-gpus-per-node 8 \
    ${MODEL_ARGS[@]} \
    --hf-checkpoint "$HF_CKPT" \
    --ref-load "$TORCH_DIST" \
    --rollout-function-path pretokenized_sft_rollout.generate_rollout \
    --prompt-data "$SFT_DATA" \
    --input-key messages \
    --metadata-key metadata \
    --num-rollout 20 \
    --rollout-batch-size 128 \
    --global-batch-size 128 \
    --loss-type sft_loss \
    --loss-mask-type qwen3_5 \
    --calculate-per-token-loss \
    --disable-compute-advantages-and-returns \
    --debug-train-only \
    --tensor-model-parallel-size 1 \
    --pipeline-model-parallel-size 4 \
    --decoder-first-pipeline-num-layers 16 \
    --decoder-last-pipeline-num-layers 14 \
    --context-parallel-size 1 \
    --expert-model-parallel-size 1 \
    --expert-tensor-parallel-size 1 \
    --recompute-granularity full \
    --recompute-method uniform \
    --recompute-num-layers 1 \
    --use-dynamic-batch-size \
    --max-tokens-per-gpu 8192 \
    --optimizer adam --lr 1e-5 --lr-decay-style cosine --min-lr 1e-6 \
    --lr-warmup-fraction 0.1 --weight-decay 0.1 --adam-beta1 0.9 --adam-beta2 0.98 \
    --use-distributed-optimizer \
    --optimizer-cpu-offload \
    --overlap-cpu-optimizer-d2h-h2d \
    --use-precision-aware-optimizer \
    --attention-dropout 0.0 --hidden-dropout 0.0 \
    --accumulate-allreduce-grads-in-fp32 --attention-softmax-in-fp32 \
    --attention-backend flash \
    --distributed-timeout-minutes 30 \
    --tensorboard-dir "$PROFILE_DIR"
notes: |
  - Starting point: slime's Qwen3.5-27B script, `scripts/run-qwen3.5-27B.sh` with `scripts/models/qwen3.5-27B.sh` at
    slime 0.3.0. slime ships it as a 4-node GRPO script and publishes no tokens/s figure for it. Ported to this
    workload on one 8-GPU node with its layout (TP 4 with sequence parallel, PP 2 with 34/30 layers, CP 1 in place of
    its CP 4, full recompute, Adam on the CPU), it measured 861.5 tokens/s/GPU on 8 H100; ATTUNE tuned it to 1,480.4
    (+72%).
  - Step times of the measured run range from 78.7 s to 105.6 s (median 87.0 s), which sets the 8.9% step-time CV.
  - The optimizer stays on the CPU: the tuning run that kept 30% of it on the GPU (`--optimizer-offload-fraction 0.7`)
    ran out of memory on the last stage, which holds the FP32 logits of the 248,320-token vocabulary.

Citation

If you use a recipe by ATTUNE, please cite the paper.

BibTeX
@article{fan2026attune,
  title   = {{ATTUNE: Agentic Throughput Tuning for LLM Training}},
  author  = {Leo Fan and Hongyang Wang and Wenbo Chen and Jingguo Liu and Xian Li and Xuan Wang and
             Ruochen Wen and Yiming Yan and Hao Wu and Zheshen Wang and Benoit Dumoulin},
  journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2610.17528},
  year    = {2026},
  url     = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17528}
}

Qwen3.8-27B on other GPUs

H100 · 8 GPUs · this page
1,480.4
tokens/s/GPU · $1.29 / 1M tokens
H200 · 8 GPUs
1,194.3
tokens/s/GPU · $1.84 / 1M tokens
B200 · 8 GPUs
4,011.4
tokens/s/GPU · $0.99 / 1M tokens